By the late 1880s there was an urgent need to replace not only the surviving ECR and early GER tanks pottering up and down lightly laid rustic branch lines, but also the aged locomotives in charge of the quarter-hourly service on the Fenchurch Street – Blackwall line.
George England’s indigenous London & Blackwall 2-4-0Ts had been withdrawn from the line in 1882, and the positively ancient Jones & Potts 2-2-2WTs became extinct a year later. At that time, examples of Robert Sinclair’s V class 2-4-2WTs, the ‘Scotchmen’ had been allocated the services, but these were gradually withdrawn throughout the decade as their boilers expired, and a steady succession of Adams, Bromley and Worsdell tank engines temporarily took charge.
Classified under Stratford’s Letter Account as E22, nine of the first batch of ten 0-6-0Ts nos. 150 – 158 were delivered to the Running Department between 5th Feb and 18th March 1889 with no.159 following on June 24th. About half were immediately rusticated to various branch lines and the rest allocated to Millwall Junction, a sub-shed of Stratford, for working out of Fenchurch Street to Blackwall and North Woolwich.
The E22s were a development of the T18 class but of lighter construction. Their butt-jointed boilers pressed to 140 psi were shared with the T18 class and the wheelbase was identical, but the side tanks and cab were smaller and the frames 1ft shorter at the rear to help steady the ride at passenger speeds. The cylinders were smaller than the T18’s at 14″ diameter with a 20″ stroke, and the crank axles, crossheads, slidebars and connecting rods were also lighter than those used on the earlier class.

Beautiful! E22 no. 151 at Braintree during the period 1889-1894 in ‘as built’ condition with the original flat-faced smokebox built up from angle iron, separate handrails, Roscoe lubricator on the smokebox, no coal rails on the bunker and without the Macallen blastpipe lever to the smokebox. In typical E22 fashion it’s running as a 2-4-0T with the front coupling rods removed. For such an early shot there’s already a considerable amount of heat distress to both the smokebox and chimney, and despite not appearing in the scan, the original photograph clearly shows patterns of traffic grime on the side tanks and sooty grime deposits on the boiler. Photograph ©Public Domain.
Instead of fitting the same cast iron 15-spoke unbalanced wheels as the T18s, Holden gave the E22s new 10-spoke balanced wheels with a 10″ crank throw which meant the outside brake pull rods didn’t require the characteristic 1½” drop sections in the path of the crankpin as did their predecessor. As a consequence of the lightly constructed motion and short cylinder stoke the E22s only required small balance weights; on the leading and trailing driving wheels the weights were formed by filling the adjacent spokes to the crankpin, and the inner wheels had half-width weights on the same side as the crankpin but extending over into the space between the adjoining spokes.
By the late 1880s most of the rest of the world was using steel for inner fireboxes, but in Great Britain copper was the preferred medium. Numbers 150 – 158 were released to traffic with the usual copper fireboxes, but no.159 was given an experimental steel one, and it’s almost certain that the delay in its release to traffic was due to comprehensive testing. No.159 kept the steel firebox until a General overhaul lasting between September 1909 and January 1910 when it was rebuilt with a new telescopic boiler (fitted to all the E22 rebuilds) and a conventional copper firebox. As with the T18 class, the clack boxes on the original boilers were positioned on the centre line of the dome.
The E22s were regaled with all the contemporary standard GER fittings; including a Worsdell pattern stovepipe, dome and shrouded twin Ramsbottom safety valves with the whistle seated on the raised valve base, the Westinghouse brake and screw reverse for passenger duties. The engines were finished in ultramarine which in the late 1880s was still applied to all new and rebuilt locomotives.
As built, boiler handrails were in three separate sections and the one on the driver’s side incorporated the Worsdell pattern spherical blower operated by a rod inside the rail. The tank filler lids were the same cast iron hinged type which had been fitted to the T18s. The tanks themselves extended into the cabs, and as with the T18s ended inside with a curved top. Due to the short cab the front plate of the bunker was flush with the cab door, and the brake standard was completely enclosed within the bunker with a long vertical slot in the plate for maintenance access. As released to traffic the E22s were fitted with Worsdell’s parallel buffer housings.
From 1892 all new and replacement Great Eastern smokeboxes were of a flanged construction with a radiused leading edge, replacing the previous smokebox design constructed from built-up angle iron, and the E22 class would have been fitted with them from the mid-late 1890s as their original ones wore out and further repair deemed not viable.

Number 151 again, but this time in the period 1895 – 1901 before its first rebuilding. It has a new flanged smokebox and new (or reconditioned) chimney, the Worsdell spherical blower at the end of the handrail is prominent, and the other pipe lower down on the smokebox is the Westinghouse pump exhaust (the pump is fitted to the tank front). The loco is still running as a 2-4-0T but four coal rails have been fitted to the bunker. Again, in the original photograph, patterns of traffic grime can be discerned on the side tanks and bunker. Photograph ©Public Domain.
Between 20th February and 10th April 1893 ten more E22s to Letter Account B32 were released to traffic. Numbered 245 – 254, they were given slightly lower but wider tanks than the first batch, increasing the water capacity from 600 to 650 gallons, and the cabs and bunkers were widened to match. As with no.159, the ten B32 locos were given steel fireboxes and kept them until all were rebuilt between December 1908 and September 1912. Contrary to what has been published elsewhere and regurgitated ad infinitum, none of these eleven locos fitted with steel fireboxes had the safety valves moved from the firebox to the rear ring of the boiler – more on this in the next entry. As with the E22 batch, about half were sent to work on the Fenchurch Street line where they monopolised services, while the rest were sent to outlying districts.
Unlike the original batch, the ten B32 locos appear to have been fitted with an 8-bolt tapered buffer housing from new. Later, during overhaul, these would be swapped with whatever was to hand, some of the E22s receiving tapered housings and some B32s the parallel type.
Like the E22s, the B32s were all finished in the ultramarine blue livery which, by the early 1890s was only applied to passenger-rated Westinghouse-fitted locomotives.
All twenty locos were built with Roscoe displacement lubricators on the fireman’s side of the smokebox, but from 1894 they were gradually replaced with sight feed lubricators located in the cab.

E22 no.155 heads a line-up including T18 no. 318 and an unidentified M15 built after 1905. Both the E22 and T18 have been rebuilt (no.155 in 1905 and no.318 in 1904) – with 160psi telescopic boilers and the clack valves seated further forward. The Macallen blastpipe operating lever is prominent on the smokebox, and the Roscoe lubricator has been removed. No.155 was a regular on the Blackwall line for many years and is still running as a 2-4-0T. The locos are all pretty grimy and there’s considerable heat distress to the E22s smokebox and chimney. Photograph ©Public Domain.
From about 1894 (though the B32s may have had them from new) the locos were fitted with Macallen’s patent blastpipe, and from about the same date some of the class were given continuous handrails. Some of those with continuous handrails were also fitted with Holden’s Rotary pattern blower valve operated via a crank attached to a push-pull rod inside the handrail. Others received the handrail but retained the Worsdell blower but now fitted higher on the smokebox – the operating rod clearing the top of the tank. Some may even have been fitted with Holden’s short-lived slide-valve blower, but I’ve not yet seen any photographic evidence.
From 1895 the twenty locos were gradually fitted with coal rails as they passed through the Works, some gaining three rails, others four.
Between 1899 and 1912 the whole class was reboilered with 160psi telescopic boilers and copper fireboxes which were interchangeable with the T18 and R24 classes. These new boilers had the clack valves positioned closer to the smokebox.
Services
Given their allocations and duties it would seem that the E22s are barely relevant to Basilica Fields. However, from 1901 the last Sunday Up train from Buntingford ran through to Liverpool Street. It’s possible that this working via Broxbourne, Lea Bridge and Stratford may occasionally (say, in the event of a failure on the Hertford branch) have been hauled by one of the resident Buntingford locos, which from 1889 to the mid-1890s were numbers 158 and 159. Tenuous, I know, but I’m going to stick my head in the sand and run with it! Other members of the class were allocated to Buntingford from about 1905.
Many examples of the class ran as 2-4-0Ts with the leading section of the coupling rods removed, all engines working the Blackwell line were altered in this way, as were a number of those allocated to country depots such as Braintree. No official reason for this has been given, though over the years suggestions have varied from enabling the locos to traverse sharper curves, to protecting both the flanges and rails. Neither explanation rings true as the practice generally ceased under the LNER except on the tight curves of Ipswich docks with no discernible difference. Whatever the reason their low tractive effort of 11,100lbs and high axle weight over the leading and trailing wheels would have made the locos quite free-running four-coupled machines, and with their relatively light loads of four to five four-wheeled coaches, were unlikely to experience the embarrassment of slipping. Under Fredrick V. Russell – James Holden’s brilliant young protégé – trials were also undertaken with the locos running as 0-4-2Ts, but the results must have proved less satisfactory as they stopped early on.

No.248 from the B32 batch of 1893, running as a 2-4-0T, hauls a train of five six-wheel carriages past Haydon Square Junction on the 1.35pm Blackwall – Fenchurch Street service on 12th July 1913. Their long history with the line earned the tanks the soubriquet ‘Blackwall Tanks’. Photograph ©Public Domain.
Model
A couple of years ago I scratchbuilt an example in an LNER/British Railways transitional livery here, but have in my Basilica Fields pile of brass of one of the long-discontinued and much-missed J65 kits from Connoisseur Models, and will be using this as the basis for building one of the Buntingford locos, probably no.158, for the through service to Liverpool Street.
Source Material
It’s perhaps not surprising that most of the sources for this article are the same as for the T18 class.
- Great Eastern Locomotives Past & Present 1862-1945 – C Langley Aldrich RCTS Locomotives of the LNER Part 8A
- Locomotives Illustrated #116
- Yeadon’s Register Volume 48
- Lyn Brooks of the GERS
- John Gardner of the GERS
March 9, 2014 at 7:57 am
Hi Adrian.
Very interesting, and a beautiful little engine.
The placing of the westinghouse on the front of the tank ( not only done on the GER ) must have been a nightmare for the crew as once ware had creept in, they had a tendancy to just stop pumping, requiring a sharp blow from a spanner or something to shock them into action again.
If you ever visit the bluebell railway, check out the E4’s pump. it has evidence of my attention from the 70’s. ( unless they’v changed it ).
If that is the case on these E22’s/ B32’s, the crew had a precariouse trip to rectify it’s tendancy to just stop pumping, especially on the B32 class as there would have been very little foot hold due to the wide tanks.
Your scratched built model is beautiful. love the dirt effect on the side of the tank. you’v captured the wet greasy feel speacially near the tank filler end.
These must have looked stuning when new in their Prussian blue livery.
Oh for a time machine.
cheers.
Alan.
March 9, 2014 at 4:04 pm
Hi Alan,
Yes there are plenty of photos of GE engines with the casing of the Westo pump stoved in from a succession of blows from the fireman’s hammer or a large spanner. I’ve not read any reminisces of the crew inching along the running plate between stations to give it a good whack – always dangerous in the London district with limited clearances in the tunnels and brick cuttings – but plenty of instances of them smacking merry hell out of the thing in the short 30 seconds given for each station stop.
Holden’s predecessor, Wordsdell, fitted the pumps in the cabs of his M15 class (to be dealt with in a future installment) – perhaps easier for the crew to deal with when acting up, but I suspect not to easy on the ears at full pant.
When I get down to the Bluebell (and I’ve been promising the kids a visit for a while, but it’s not been possible) I’ll check out Birch Grove. The last photos I saw of it the loco was wearing Maunsell’s smart green livery and the pump looked pristine, but a few sticky incidents could soon leave it with a succession of dents.
March 9, 2014 at 7:22 pm
Hi Adrian.
Interesting regarding the WH pump in the cab of the M15’s. I have a waiting to be finished one of them ( waiting to see how the cab was laid out ) so shall look forward to that post.
Al.
March 9, 2014 at 10:12 pm
That post is about 4 – 6 installments away, but in the meantime, if I can find some paperwork in the chaos, I may be able to help. I’ll email you during the week.
March 10, 2014 at 6:29 am
Great news,. Thanks Adrian.
Al.
March 9, 2014 at 9:33 am
Could you recommend any drawings that show the arrangement of connecting rods and valve gear? There a quite a few references in the NRM drawings list, but nothing obvious. I’m building an E22 as my first attempt at scratch building in gauge 3 (RC electric), the gap between the frames will be quite noticeable. so I’d like to fill it with something that looks vaguely correct (non functioning)
March 9, 2014 at 4:19 pm
Geoff – I caught up with your thread on Western Thunder last week – Gauge 3 is too tempting by far. I’m certain there are GAs which will be of use, if not at the NRM then at the ERO in Essex. The NRM cherry picked the crowd pleasers but the ERO has almost 40,000 Stratford drawings, mostly the (supposedly) mundane stuff, only about a third of which have so far been cataloged. I have a digitised file on my computer (which I can’t access at the moment),but somewhere I think I’ve got a printout of the catalogued ERO list. Don’t know where it it at the mo as we’re in a pickle, but I’ll see if I can find it and then if there is anything which may be of use. Sorry but it’s probably not going to be a quick process, but I’ll see what I can do.
March 9, 2014 at 10:21 am
Interesting to see how such a subtle change in the tanks affects the look of the loco – the B32 looks slightly cross-eyed in comparison.
Simon
March 9, 2014 at 4:26 pm
Ha! I’m not sure there is anyone else in the world who would have made that comment 😀
I’ll have to check, but it looks as if the spectacles were the same distance apart, so maybe the extra width to the weatherboard adds to the effect.
March 12, 2014 at 8:36 pm
I think it’s just the extra width, and slightly lower height.
I will take the other remarks as a compliment… 😉
Simon
March 9, 2014 at 11:28 am
Reblogged this on sed30's Blog and commented:
Second installment on my fav loco.
March 9, 2014 at 4:26 pm
Thanks again for the reblog, glad you’re enjoying the ride.
August 20, 2018 at 1:41 am
Drawings can be ordered for downloading here:
https://www.gersociety.org.uk/index.php/home/sales/files-emporium-2/product/68-lg008-ger-lner-0-6-0-tank-locos