In 1899, Johnson unveiled the first of what would become a class of 60 new goods tank locos, the 2441 class. Descendants of the 1102 class and antecedents of Fowler’s 3F ‘Jinties’, the first thirty of the class had condensing equipment from new for working the sub-surface lines in London between the various goods depots, and carried various detail differences which separated them from their normally aspirated sisters. To counter the side tanks from being blistered from the very hot water passing through the condensing pipes – a problem encountered on other lines, for example the Great Eastern – an outer skin was fitted to the tank sides with a small airspace between. This arrangement produced a squared front corner to the tanks with pairs of cooling slots on the front edge, whereas the normally aspirated locos without the outer panel had rounded tank corners.
Those allocated to London were initially painted and lined in the highly decorative ‘London style’ of crimson lake with almost everything above and below the footplate lined out. No. 2444 is seen here on 6th June 1903 at Cricklewood in just such a livery, and despite appearing at first glance to be in ex-works condition (a misused phrase so beloved of authors of books and magazines), it instead bears the marks of hard work on the Widened Lines; traffic dust and grime haze over the wheels, underframe, valence, bunker and tank sides – the numbers have had attention from the tallow cloth to make them appear clearer, and there are signs of a hot smokebox and chimney too. It’s worth noting the slightly shorter boiler fittings, especially the chimney and dome, and especially the arrangement of the Salter valves, with the pillars attached to the sides of the tank rather than the top of the boiler.
May 14, 2010 at 9:02 am
I am not sure about the numbers having had attention from a cloth to make clearer… looking at an enlarged image the numbers would appear to be separate brass figures and so the cleaners would have used brick-dust or pumice to remove the oxidation layer and polish the metal surface. OK, maybe tallow was used to coat the surface of the brass and thereby slow down the tarnishing from the tunnel atmosphere.
What was the impact of the outer skin to the tanks on the overall weisth of the tanks? If greater then were the cab and bunker made wider as well?
The lining on this engine looks very attractive and shall be worth seeing as the engine emerges onto the stage of the EWL.
Graham
May 14, 2010 at 3:33 pm
I think you’ve misunderstood my comment about the numbers. Have a look at the enlarged image and you’ll see a very clean rectangular box surrounding the numbers as a whole where the haze of traffic grime has been removed. I can see how my original comment implied that the individual numbers had had attention. Mea culpa.
The tank casings were made from 11swg steel, spaced 7/8″ from the tank fronts and sides, so the overall width of the tank structure an a condensing variant was almost 2″ greater than an normally aspirated one. Neither cab nor bunker was widened to match. Wild Swan have book on the class in their Midland Engines series (No.5) which is packed with GAs and much information from David Hunt, Bob Essery and Fred James, RRP £12.95. A good buy!
The lining is very attractive, and challenging too. I foresee much forward planning will be needed during the build to do it justice, and the cab interior could be, well…interesting: Grained oak edged black, fine lined yellow. Blimey.
May 15, 2010 at 9:38 am
I agree with you about the “box” around the numbers…
Thank you for explaining about the tank sheeting.
I do not envy you with the task of working out what has to be removable to paint the engine, let alone the order in which to do the painting and assembly thereafter.
Graham