So far I’ve discussed the Basilica Fields project running c1890-1898, and I’ve already admitted that this is quite a big timeframe to deal with, especially as it is one in which a great many changes took place. However, dealing with so many railway companies and a very incomplete historical record when taken as a whole, I’m left with little choice, and it has proven impossible to narrow things down further. Even with this very large window in time of almost a decade, there are still gaping holes where I’m simply going to have to make a best guestimate based upon the information and advice given to me by those who are well respected in their areas of historical railway knowledge.
Nevertheless, despite the pitfalls, 1898 isn’t the end of the Basilica Fields story, and I also intend to run a 1899-c1906 period. Again, this is very feather-edged with no delineated start or cut-off point, and like in the earlier period there will be times when there will be anachronistic pieces of stock running…but not in the same train.
‘Why?’ is a very legitimate question, and is one which I’ve been asked more than once. The answer is simple; the last decade of the 19th century saw the pinnacle in artistic locomotive and stock design, and one which contrasts with the early years of the 20th century when there was a move towards more powerful looking designs. It’s a fascinating change, and one of the big advantages of modelling such a wide timeframe – indeed, one of my earliest ideas, and something that I kept coming back to when planning all of this – is the opportunity to show not what the railway looked like at a certain date, but to show the changes that took place over a period of time. Few modellers have attempted anything quite so daft, and to be honest, I now know why!
Head in the sand or not, this is what I plan to do, so without further ado…
May 13, 2010 at 11:17 am
OK, tongue-in-cheek time…
What you are describing is your view of a timeline in history. How about your view of a timeline to create your view?
Your comment about the era being that of attractive design is very much how I see the contemporary scene – especially with the emergence of 4-6-0 classes of the GWR, the GCR and the S69s.
regards, Graham
May 13, 2010 at 8:25 pm
Glad that was tongue-in-cheek… đŸ™‚
I don’t disagree with you that your contemporary 4-6-0s are very attractive. However, coupled with their undeniable aesthetic charms is a sense of brute power and purpose which I feel missing from most Victorian locos, which to my eye at least, were more graceful and elegant.
Both periods produced very attractive locomotives for very different reasons.